A new investigation has revealed the growing influence of Sharia councils in the UK, sparking calls for decisive action to protect British law and values. The Times reported that 85 Sharia courts are now operating across the country, raising concerns over issues like polygamy, unfair inheritance practices, and the exploitation of vulnerable women.
This comes despite claims earlier this year that the suggestion of Sharia law operating in the UK was nothing more than an “anti-Muslim conspiracy theory.” Now, those accusations have been debunked, with evidence that these councils are offering rulings on personal matters, such as wills, marriages, and divorces, often to the detriment of women’s rights.
The report highlights troubling cases, such as one council elder reportedly justifying domestic violence and advising women to accept exploitative “pleasure marriages” that allow for temporary sexual relationships. Critics argue these councils create a two-tier legal system, undermining British law and leaving vulnerable individuals trapped within restrictive cultural norms.
Speaking on GB News, Suzanne Evans, political consultant and commentator, argued:
“There must be one law for all. These so-called courts undermine British values and disproportionately oppress women. Sharia councils have no place in the UK.”
Lord Bailey, a Conservative peer, agreed, stating:
“The word ‘court’ should be reserved for official legal systems. These councils have no legal authority and yet wield dangerous power within closed communities.”
The investigation has reignited debate over whether Sharia councils should be banned entirely. Former Labour adviser Matthew Laza voiced his support for stronger regulation, saying:
“Everyone must be equal under the law. Sharia councils operate in secrecy, isolating vulnerable women from accessing justice. It’s time to end this.”
However, some, like Evans, pointed out the practical challenges:
“Banning these councils entirely could leave women unable to secure religious divorces. This isn’t just a Muslim issue—similar councils exist in other faiths, like Jewish Beth Dins. The solution might be to require all religious marriages to have a legally binding civil ceremony alongside them.”
The panel discussed how the growth of Sharia councils reflects broader challenges with multiculturalism in the UK. Host Mike Graham didn’t mince words:
“Why are people coming to the UK and trying to impose Sharia law? If you want to live under Sharia, there are plenty of countries where it’s the legal system. This is Britain, and we have one legal system for all.”
Sean Bailey echoed this sentiment, arguing:
“These councils give unaccountable individuals power over vulnerable people. It’s a breeding ground for abuse and division. Britain must reject this two-tier system.”
The discussion also raised questions about Keir Starmer’s stance. Labour’s support for Sharia councils in the past has been criticized as pandering to specific voting blocs, particularly in areas with large Muslim populations. Panelists questioned whether Starmer has the courage to address the issue head-on, especially after Labour’s reliance on the Muslim vote in key constituencies during the last election.
Matthew Laza defended Labour, insisting:
“This isn’t about targeting any faith. It’s about upholding equality before the law. Starmer has a legal background—he should recognize the dangers of these councils. This investigation is a wake-up call, and I believe he’ll take it seriously.”
The panel praised GB News for covering topics often ignored by mainstream outlets. Suzanne Evans argued:
“These issues affect millions of Britons, yet they’re swept under the rug by the mainstream media. GB News is shining a light where others won’t.”
Critics have called on the government to act decisively. Suggestions include criminalizing marriages conducted without a legal civil ceremony and enforcing stricter oversight of cultural practices that undermine British law.
A government spokesperson responded:
“Sharia law does not form any part of the legal system in England and Wales. It is right that couples should enter into legally recognized marriages to ensure protection and clarity.”
Whether Labour or the Conservatives will take meaningful action remains to be seen. But for many, the time for ignoring the issue is over.
